Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:23:06AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> >What, exactly, is the point of removing non-free from the social contract,
> >if we're not going to remove non-free entirely?
>
> Hmm.
> To remove non-free, but not contrib?
> To add new restrictions on what can be in non-free? (Currently the only
> requirement for a package in non-free is that Debian can legally distribute
> it.)
> To move non-free to a separate FTP archive (rather than "areas in our FTP
> archive")?
What about the BTS then ? Will we host a separate non-free BTS, or not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: