On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:58:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 05:17:55PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Consider the "amendment" (in name only), > > Replace lines ^ through $ with the words, "Debian should continue to > > produce a distribution." > Huh? Do you mean replace the entire social contract with that, or replace > the text of the resolution with that? The text of the resolution. > Why do you think that voting for "Remove non-free" means that we wouldn't > continue to produce a distribution? Why do you think that ballot would be > treated differently to: > [ ] Remove non-free? > [ ] Don't change > [ ] Further discussion > ? Because in your example, the ballot options are non-orthogonal. In my example, they are quite deliberately orthogonal, and don't belong on the same ballot together at all -- an attack that the current system has no built-in protections against. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature