[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

request for correction of minor error in ballot option

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:51:59PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Was there any specific reason to use "3:1 majority" and "3:1
> super-majority" in a same section for Proposal A and C?  They look
> inconsistent to me but seem to cause no real impact.

[as discussed with Manoj on IRC]

I hereby request that the Project Secretary amend the "Proposal C"
ballot option, which I proposed, to use the term "majority" instead of

I further suggest that any permutation of the term "super-majority",
including "supermajority" and "super majority", also be altered to
"majority" in those portions of the ballot which are not options.

Sorry to delay the onset of voting for this.

G. Branden Robinson                |
Debian GNU/Linux                   |         De minimis non curat lex.
branden@debian.org                 |
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: