Re: Third call for votes: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying GR
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:42:42 +0100, Paul Martin <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:24:21PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary
>> This is the third call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD
>> vote tallying GR.
> I'm not responding to this CFV, as:
You can chose whatever reason you want for not exercising your
franchise (though I think this is extremely silly).
> * The PGP signature is bad on the CFV messages, so I'm assuming they
> are forged.
> * The message comes through in some garbled form of quoted printable
> that my mail program cannot interpret, so the form is corrupted.
> The two problems may be related. Previous CFVs (eg DPL election)
> have been fine.
That is because they were clear signed text/plain
messages. Thie CFV was pgp/mime signed.
You ought to bring your mail system into the current
century. However, since quorum for this vote is met, I don't care
what luddite reason you use for not voting.
If you want to travel around the world and be invited to speak at a
lot of different places, just write a Unix operating system. Linus
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C