Re: Better quorum change proposal, with justifiction
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:33:07PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> No, it's not a quorum system. Quorum is always opinion-neutral, under
> every defintion.
Trivial counter-example: it's not under mine.
(Quorum is a small group of people that are necessary to make decisions;
normally, they just have to be present, in this case they have to support
the decision. If you don't like the word, that's fine. If you don't like
the semantics, don't argue over definitions)
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''