Follow-up question (other candidates are free to respond): On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:22:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 3. We'd better release : > > [ ] twice a year > > [ ] once a year > > [ ] every two years > > [ ] always, we just throw stable away and keep a slightly modified > > testing as official stable > I don't have a strong personal opinion on this. Sorry to be so > non-commital, but I live in Debian unstable and so the release schedule > doesn't impact me the way it does our users. I think it would be > interesting to survey the developers and have some conversations with > the Release Manager before mandating any sort of time frame. Does this mean you believe it falls within the authority of the DPL to "mandate [a] time frame" for releases? Who would be bound by such a mandate, and what would be the consequences of failing to meet such a release deadline? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgp_V8YG1BA88.pgp
Description: PGP signature