[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: voting amendment: todo

On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 03:48:15PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> "no longer in doubt" should mean that enough of all voters have voted
> that even if every remaining voter voted in opposition to the winner the
> outcome would be the same.

That doesn't take into account the fact that everyone could be infected
by a mind-rotting disease the day before the vote ends and submit a
new ballot.  (I think it'd be better to just drop that clause entirely,
it's not really useful)


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: pgpyASvPrqWvj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: