Hi, Raul Miller: > > > e. If a majority of n:1 is required for A, and B is the default > > > option, N(B,A) is n. In all other cases, N(B,A) is 1. > > > > I would generalize that to n:m (a 60% majority is 3:2, for instance). > > Why? Describing this would make the draft more verbose -- what does > this complexity do for us? > It offends my aesthetic senses as a programmer. ;-) Rewriting it as >>> e. If a majority of n:m is required for A, and B is the default >>> option, N(B,A) is (n/m). In all other cases, N(B,A) is 1. doesn't look any more verbose to me. -- Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
Attachment:
pgpOmxcFLx9LB.pgp
Description: PGP signature