Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying

[Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:38:46PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Except that dominates is (if I understand correctly) the appropriate
> term-of-art.

I'm not sure what you mean by this.  What is your basis for this
statement?

Here's my understanding:

The only place the constitution uses the word "dominates" is in the
appendix (A.6).  The proposed constitutional ammendment replaces that
part of the appendix.

One of the reasons for proposing a new voting system is the ambiguity
of the term "dominates" as defined by the constitution (A.6.2).

Thanks,

-- 
Raul