Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
En réponse à Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shalehperry@attbi.com>:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 02:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:06:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am against this proposal as well. W should not be making
> > > things harder for legitimate users, treating them as acceptable
> > > collateral damage in the war on spam. Spam filtering works; and
> people
> > > who still have a problem should investigate
> > > http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ for an excellent tool.
> >
> > Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do
> it
> > after having paid for the download of the spam over a possibly slow
> and
> > expensive modem connection.
>
> now that all of the debian-* lists are being run through spamassassin
> your
> daily dose of canned meat should drop nicely.
It does not work. What about those italian spams we received
yesterday and today? If the debian server only mark the mails as
being spam and send them anyway, what do you get?
--
Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>
<jerome.marant@free.fr>
http://marant.org
Reply to: