[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying



On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:56:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > OTOH, so far none of this has mattered:
> > > "Past performance is no guarantee of future results."
> > 
> > Sure, I figured most people would draw the same conclusions themselves,
> > given the data.
> 
> I see no evidence that people's opinions are leaning one way or the
> other, yet.
> 
> Perhaps Manoj should post to debian-devel-announce about this RFD; we
> may have lost many subscribers to the months where nothing but spam
> appeared on this list.

It would probably help if somebody could put together a simpler
description of the problems and proposed solutions; I got about
halfway before thinking "I need to do some serious reading about
voting systems before this is going to make sense", and I doubt I was
the only one.

Discussion isn't very likely to happen otherwise.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
 `. `'                          | Imperial College,
   `-             -><-          | London, UK

Attachment: pgpfahYeI6Vdd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: