Re: Trying to determin the Quorum
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
Thomas> May I suggest that one of the Project Secretary's jobs should be to
Thomas> maintain an accurate and up-to-date developers list.
Why the secretary? Apart from votes, the secretary is not
involved in adding or removing people from the project, and shall
always have to rely on information provided by other people.
Secondly. I do think the process used provides the canonical
number of developers; it can be checked by anyone, and the same list
is used to determine whether one is authorized to install packages
into Debian.
Thomas> There are various reasons (some of which you note) for why
Thomas> the key ring is not an adequate list...
I do think that the keyring is the only authoritative list of
developers, as long as one eliminates duplicates, and LDAP does seem
to provide an adequate means of doing so.
manoj
--
"Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." Chesterton
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: