Re: Our counting procedure
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:56:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 11:53:51AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > >> Raul Miller <email@example.com> writes:
> > > > Here's how people voted:
> > > Can any of you guys that recounted the results (you know you did)
> > > confirm that the numbers are right?
> > Hmm, actually, I get different results too.
> > Just taking:
> The thing is, you only get a vote over someone else if they marked it.
> IOW, if I only mark "--1--", then my vote is as good as nothing, since I
> made no preference of one over the other. So not specifying a rank in
> the order pretty much alleviates that choice in the tally for that
> particular vote.
Err, i thought that not voting for someone (leaving it blank) would mean that
everyone would dominate that choice. I think the constitution or a previous
message here explains it as such. Am i wrong ?