Re: Vote Tallied
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:56:49PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Ok,
> >
> > I fixed that part of the code. All future votes will be tallied correctly.
> > The entire ballot box is saved. Shortly, I'll run the mails through the
> > vote-take script again. EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who has voted will
> > receive a SECOND confirmation in the next couple of days. If the second
> > confirmation is STILL wrong, please let us know.
>
> how can we know it is wrong (well know for sure, as different from having the
> suspision ?)
>
> if the ballot is listed as 1234 for example, does this correspond to voting
> for all 4 candidates and not having filled the further discution, or does it
> correspond to having voted for everyone except the first candidate.
>
> Or should it have been a ballot of -1234 or 1234- ?
>
> Anyway, i guess my ballot was also wrongly acounted, but i will wait for the
> second confirmation now, ...
CONSPIRACY!!
I demand a manual recount..
--
Brian Russo <brusso@phys.hawaii.edu>
Debian/GNU Linux <wolfie@debian.org> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member" <wolfie@lpsg.org> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Reply to: