** On Jun 16, John Goerzen scribbled: > grendel@vip.net.pl (Marek Habersack) writes: > > > ** On Jun 13, John Goerzen scribbled: > > > > [snip] > > > > facts I outlined are true, then the GR doesn't make sense at all! ANd that's > > > > > > Why? Why does it not make sense to remove the non-free software from > > > the Debian Project? > > Because many developers and users think and have written so that it would be > > harmful from the technical point of view. And that, in turn, would hurt the > > Debian Project. > > Just because people have written something does not make it so. I No, but it's an opinion of many people and what I wrote was a precise response to your question. You asked 'why?' and I responded. I think that the opinion of majority is what drives democracy ahead, isn't it? Before you reply - I *don't* claim that "my side" (as you wrote below) is the majority, I merely state a basic fact that founds a democratic system. > don't expect people to take what I write on face value; I see no > reason why I should automatically accept that everything somebody on > your side of the argument writes must automatically be correct. I see no such reason either. But I have seen many reasonable arguments on "my side" of the debate, but very few on "your side". > I think and have written that it would not be harmful from the > technical point of view. I guess the fact that I think and write this > automatically makes me correct? No, and please stop being malicious, ok? You have written that it doesn't hurt the technical side of Debian, but you haven't prooved it yet (IMO). > Please. I'm not correct simply because I had an idea. Whether or not I never said that, don't twist my words again, please. > I am correct depends on more substantial analysis. Definitely. But so far (IMO) there was no such analysis, only the statements not supported by indisbutable arguments. Again, it's *IMO*. marek
Attachment:
pgpVEoZ62v74n.pgp
Description: PGP signature