[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5



On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:27:28PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 	A suggested ballot for the secretary to consider is:
> - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  [ ] YES to proposal A:             Foundation + issue/modify/withdraw
>        Amend the constitution to introduce Foundation Documents, allow
>        the  developers  to issue, modify and withdraw  them with a 3:1
>        super majority,  and to allow the  developers to issue,  modify
>        and  withdraw all other non technical  documents  with a simple
>        majority   
>  [ ] YES to proposal B                      issue/modify/withdraw only
>        Amend the constitution to allow the developers to issue, modify
>        and withdraw all non technical documents with a simple majority        
>  [ ] Further discussion

Manoj, ...

Why do you not provide an option to vote no to both proposal without further
discution ?


Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: