Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure
- To: Debian Vote Discussion List <debian-vote@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:22:03 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20001012102203.K518@cistron.nl>
- Mail-followup-to: Debian Vote Discussion List <debian-vote@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20000929063017.A26845@olemiss.edu>; from cnlawren@olemiss.edu on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 06:30:17AM -0500
- References: <E13cbTo-0007B9-00@darren> <sa7g0mo2xot.fsf@indy.progenylinux.com> <20000927215140.L25312@sarge.private.brainfood.com> <20000928184127.B5229@tardis.ed.ac.uk> <20000928141844.M25312@sarge.private.brainfood.com> <20000928125202.A10011@willamette.edu> <20000929032448.B6763@debian.org> <20000929063017.A26845@olemiss.edu>
Previously Chris Lawrence wrote:
> I'm fairly sure Wichert posted several months ago that he was opposed
> to Branden's proposal, but I can't seem to find the message locally
> (and can't even remember what list it was on...). The only reason I
> remember it is that his opposition surprised me (given his leading
> role in the last Non-Free Debacle (tm)).
That was about moving non-free, not removing it.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: