Re: [BALLOT] Social Contract Change Amendment
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 02:45:17PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 07:49:19PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > These instructions are a little clearer....
>
> This is not any clearer as the first, you have to do a lot of thinking before
> finding out what may be meant, and the fact that there are two ballots only
> confuse that.
>
> I think that if you send a ballot where the response expected from the voter
> is yes or no, then at least you should include the question to which the user
> reply in the ballot, in a clear way, so as to not confuse people.
>
This almost strikes me as being some kind of conspiracy to prevent
people from voting by confusing them with the very ballot... :-/
Please, make the format of ballots comprehensive for human beings!
Thank you, P. *8^)
Reply to: