[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Seconded

In <[🔎] 6585-Tue10Oct2000030029-0500-srivasta@acm.org>,
 on "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 03:00:29 -0500",
 with "PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5",
  Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:

srivasta> 	Indeed, I had proposed this in -project on the 19th of
srivasta>  July. This addresses the same ambiguity that Brandon does in his
srivasta>  proposal, but in a distincly different fashion. I would suggest that
srivasta>  this should be offered as an alternative to Brandon's proposal, if it
srivasta>  comes to a vote (if the rules lawyers deem that permissible). If not,
srivasta>  this may stand on its own (leaving open the possibility that both,
srivasta>  almost opposite, amendments may be accepted). 
srivasta> 
srivasta> 	I am now looking for seconds for this proposal. 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iD8DBQE54voV0LPz0K4xwAkRAlEQAKC37Ri5hJvH7D/h0oJs3/zSlhv55gCggFVr
EJaVM6KAGyNdBbHKHns+Sks=
=iHFn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: