Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

[Buddha Buck <bmbuck@14850.com>]

At 02:28 PM 9/27/00 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The problem is:
> >
> >       (a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
> >           legally (according to the constitution) be modified
> >       (b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> >           should require a supermajority
> >       (c) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> >           by simple majority is perfectly reasonable and legal under the
> >           constitution
>
> So, the real problem is:
>
> * Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
> way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
> to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".

What about Article 7, Section 1, Clause 3?

> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org