Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

> The problem is:
> 
> 	(a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
> 	    legally (according to the constitution) be modified
> 	(b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> 	    should require a supermajority
> 	(c) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> 	    by simple majority is perfectly reasonable and legal under the
> 	    constitution

So, the real problem is:

* Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".