Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal
The real reason is that Gecko has just been extremely busy. He'll
plan to do it soon.
-- John
Buddha Buck <bmbuck@14850.com> writes:
> At 01:49 PM 8/23/00 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> >I just assumed the proposal originator decided it wasn't going to
> >pass anyway and let's just spare the project the agony of going
> >through it. Just speculation on my part. Seemed like a good
> >decision if that was the case.
>
> My interpretation was that the original proposal raised some
> constitutional questions which the Project Secretary hasn't answered
> yet. vote.debian.org still lists the needed quorum as "Due to the
> uniqueness of the situation, quorum is yet to be determined".
>
>
> I had thought that John had wanted this voted on (hence the CFV), but
> ballots haven't been made yet, nor a vote done.
>
>
>
>
>
> >--
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org
> >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
> --
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> www.complete.org
Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc. www.progenylinux.com
#include <std_disclaimer.h> <jgoerzen@progenylinux.com>
Reply to: