Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Joey" == Joey Hess <email@example.com> writes:
> Joey> So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the
> Joey> text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph.
> I think that is what should be done in any case, if this GR
> passes. We leave the DFSG around (since other people and projects
> have defined themselves around the DFSG, and they may not wish to
> change). (historical reasons also present themselves).
> If the GR passes, the project can choose to adopt DFSG-2 (-3,
> -4, ...) as we wish.
Makes sense to me. Except, I think I mispoke and the GR doesn't actually
touch the DFSG at all, just other parts of the Social Contract.
see shy jo