On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 01:35:24PM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Darren> The difference is more for the casual browser browsing the > > Darren> ftp/http trees. > > > > And the non-free appearing in the path is not a dead give away? > > > > that's those debs are not an part of the official distribution? No, it's > not. Would making them available as ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/not-officially-part-of-debian--non-free/ make everyone happy then? (With a nice symlink from stable/non-free for the convenience of our users, of course. :) If that's not enough, how is non-free.debian.org enough? Shouldn't it be non-free.sorta-debian.org? How does the casual browser know that something on a particular server that *is* in the debian.org domain isn't really part of debian? Again, who's this targeted at--casual users or hard-liners who already know the difference? Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgpbIXOIYXSjB.pgp
Description: PGP signature