[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Negative Summary of the Split Proposal



Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
>  Too Vague
>  ~~~ ~~~~~
>  Implementation of this proposal is not straightforward, and is left
>  largely unspecified.  This makes it hard to understand the full effects
>  of the proposal.  It is not necessarily a problem at this stage, but it
>  should be rectified before a General Resolution is proposed.

This is actually on purpose. Since I don't know all the details about
how the mirrors are handled, the archive is maintained, etc. I think
this is an issue better decided by more knowledgeable people.

We are talking about a strategt to solve a general issue. How the
technical implementation of the result of the should be done can be
decided after the vote just as well I think.

Wichert.

-- 
==============================================================================
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wichert@cs.leidenuniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Attachment: pgppD3pw4FxfC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: