Re: Negative Summary of the Split Proposal
On Jul 03, Raul Miller wrote:
> > I'm seeing a variety of objections where people are assuming that
> > the debian web pages will not tell people how to access the non-free
> > distribution.
Chris Lawrence <quango@watervalley.net> wrote:
> I believe the assumption is that this proposal will provide a
> precedent and a pretext for such a change.
Eh? So we're voting on an issue that's not even going to be on the
ballot?
Rather than voting against A because of B why not just put B up for
a vote?
Or are you saying that B's merits are so persuasive that we have to
screw up independent issues to keep it from coming to the ballot?
--
Raul
Reply to: