Re: Ad hoc and spontaneous voting
>>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <email@example.com> writes:
Wichert> Your first and second point seem to be basically the same:
Wichert> you think the current method is not visible enough.
Frankly, I thought this was quite significant. I think that if
general resolutions can sneak by (;-) someone trying as hard as I am
to keep abreast of project/policy related issues, then something is
very wrong with current practice.
"You are old," said the youth, "and your jaws are too weak For
anything tougher than suet; Yet you finished the goose, with the
bones and the beak -- Pray, how did you manage to do it?" "In my
youth," said his father, "I took to the law, And argued each case
with my wife; And the muscular strength which it gave to my jaw, Has
lasted the rest of my life." "You are old," said the youth, "one
would hardly suppose That your eye was as steady as ever; Yet you
balanced an eel on the end of your nose -- What made you so awfully
clever?" "I have answered three questions, and that is enough," Said
his father. "Don't give yourself airs! Do you think I can listen all
day to such stuff? Be off, or I'll kick you down stairs!"
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E