[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ad hoc and spontaneous voting

"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org> writes:

> What about the proposer of a vote writing the pros, and---at the end
> of the discussion period---anybody so inclined submitting cons by
> means of a procedure similar to the amendment one (i.e., with a proper
> number of supporters, I mean).

Seconded, er, I mean, that sounds quite reasonable to me.  ;-)

I'm a little uncomfortable with the idea of proposals being rejected
because they "sound crazy".  Smacks a bit too much of censorship.
Better to present the pros and cons without commentary, and let us
judge what's crazy and what's not.  IMO.

Anyway, I *want* to see the crazy proposals!  They could be very
funny! :-)
Chris Waters   xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
      or    xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr     | this .signature file.

Reply to: