Re: Ad hoc and spontaneous voting
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> What about the proposer of a vote writing the pros, and---at the end
> of the discussion period---anybody so inclined submitting cons by
> means of a procedure similar to the amendment one (i.e., with a proper
> number of supporters, I mean).
Seconded, er, I mean, that sounds quite reasonable to me. ;-)
I'm a little uncomfortable with the idea of proposals being rejected
because they "sound crazy". Smacks a bit too much of censorship.
Better to present the pros and cons without commentary, and let us
judge what's crazy and what's not. IMO.
Anyway, I *want* to see the crazy proposals! They could be very
Chris Waters email@example.com | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or firstname.lastname@example.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.