On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:40:47PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Some constraints have been applied here on when these things will > > happen, but most has been left deliberately vague. The fate of the > > files currently in unstable/non-free is deliberately unspecified. > > How about the people proposing this have a talk to the people affected > by it -- ftpmaster, the release management team, etc -- and try to work > out the best way to carry out the transition in all aspects, so that > the project can make an informed decision in advance, rather than have > to guess about something there's a good chance we'll regret later? FUD. There is no possibility of us 'regretting' a decision of the form "Ditch non-free [y/n]", which is what this is, for technical reasons. The rest of your comments were rebutted in the mail you replied to. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature