[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment



On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 11:36:12PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 	Here is a draft ballot for the GR under discussion.

Thanks for circulating this draft.  I have some editorial suggestions.

> ######################################################################
> 
>      Votes must be received by  [time to be filled in]

Don't forget a period at the end of this sentence when you fill in the
time.

> This vote is being conducted in accordance to the Debian Constitution,

s/to/with/

> Section A, Standard Resolution Procedure, to vote on an General

s/an/a/

> Resolution to Amend the constitution to disambiguate section 4.1.5.

s/Amend/amend/

> The Full text of the amendment can be found at:

s/Full/full/

> http://www.debian.org/vote/2003/vote_0003

Is "the full text" the right term to use?  The ballot options you have
are comprehensive with respect to how they would alter the Constitution.

> HOW TO VOTE
> 
> Do not erase anything between the lines below and do not change the
> choice names.
> 
> In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1. Place a 2 in

s/preferred/most preferred/

> the brackets next to your next choice. Do not enter a number smaller

s/next choice/next most preferred choice/

s/\./, and so forth until you have placed a number next to your
least-preferred choice./

> than 1 or larger than 2. You may rank options equally (as long as all

s/2/5/

> choices X you make fall in the range 1<= X <= 2).

s/2/5/

> To vote "no, no matter what" rank "Further Discussion" as more
> desirable than the unacceptable choices, or You may rank the "Further

s/You/you/

> Discussion" choice, and leave choices you consider unacceptable
> blank. Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired
> choices, and ranked below all ranked choices. (Note: if the "Further

s/equally the least desired choices/equally least desired/

> Discussion" choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other unranked
> choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the "Further
> Discussion" choice by the voting software).
> 
> Then mail the ballot to:  [address to be filled in]

s/:// and don't forget the period at the end of the sentence.

> Don't worry about spacing of the columns or any quote characters (">")
> that your reply inserts. NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP
> signed) with your key that is in the Debian keyring. Do _NOT_ encrypt
> your ballot; the voting mechanism may not be able to decrypt your
> message.
> 
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [   ] Choice 1: Proposal A
> [   ] Choice 2: Proposal B
> [   ] Choice 3: Proposal C
> [   ] Choice 4: No action
> [   ] Choice 5: Further Discussion

Why is "Further Discussion" fully capitalized but "No action" not?

> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> Proposal A:  	 The actual text of the proposal A is:

I don't understand what is meant by "actual text", and the format of the
proposed change is not explained.

I reccomend:

Proposal A: Amend the Constitution as follows, by deleting the text
marked with minus (-) signs at left, and inserting the text marked with
plus (+) signs at left.

[...]
> Proposal B: 	The actual text of the Proposal B is:

As above.

[...]
> Proposal C: 	The actual text of the Proposal C is:

As above.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    Optimists believe we live in the
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    best of all possible worlds.
branden@debian.org                 |    Pessimists are afraid the optimists
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    are right about that.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: