Re: [Secure-testing-team] Security support for volatile?

[Teodor <mteodor@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Jim Popovitch <jimpop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 13:59, Teodor <mteodor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> IMO release candidate versions should not be uploaded to volatile.
>
> IMO "volatile" as used in "debian-volatile" is indicative of the
> project, not the package.  ClamAV, a "moving target" type project, is
> an excellent example of a debian-volatile candidate.

I'm not sure what you want to say, maybe I wasn't clear enough. The
discussion is not whether or not "clamav" should be in volatile or not
(I'm on the PRO side), but if an intermediate beta version should be
updated in volatile or not (rc1, rc2...). I'm still convinced that
clamav 0.95rc1 should *NOT* be updated in volatile, for sure I won't
upgrade to a RCx until the stable version 0.95 (or greater) is
released.

Thanks