debian-volatile list posting address (was: Will volatile or volatile-sloppy provide clamav 0.90.2 for etch?)

To: debian-volatile@volatile.debian.net
Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi+gmane@gnus.org>
Subject: debian-volatile list posting address (was: Will volatile or volatile-sloppy provide clamav 0.90.2 for etch?)
From: Bjørn Mork <bmork@dod.no>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:13:31 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bqhsle78.fsf_-_@obelix.mork.no>
References: <[🔎] 873b34n290.fsf@obelix.mork.no> <[🔎] 20070413103453.GO30992@ftbfs.de>

Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@ftbfs.de> writes:

> PS: Please use debian-volatile@lists.debian.org as mail address. 

I'm posting this to the nntp group gmane.linux.debian.volatile
gatewayed at gmane.org. Has the posting address changed, or has
gmane.org always used the wrong address?

I skimmed the Gmane FAQ but couldn't find out how to change the
address for a list already gatewayed, so I'm CCing lmi on this.


Bjørn
-- 
Satanic French peasant!

Reply to:

References:
- Will volatile or volatile-sloppy provide clamav 0.90.2 for etch?
  - From: Bjørn Mork <bmork@dod.no>
- Re: Will volatile or volatile-sloppy provide clamav 0.90.2 for etch?
  - From: Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@ftbfs.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Will volatile or volatile-sloppy provide clamav 0.90.2 for etch?
Next by Date: Have made unstable clamav_0.90.2-1 in etch
Previous by thread: Re: Will volatile or volatile-sloppy provide clamav 0.90.2 for etch?
Next by thread: Re: Will volatile or volatile-sloppy provide clamav 0.90.2 for etch?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread