Re: gtk-gnutella status
On 02.01 23:57, Anand Kumria wrote:
> 2. The patch is what you asked for.
> While I can appreciate the fact that the debian-volatile group wants
> to review changes before accepting them; essentially you are saying
> that you'll be able to spot something that neither upstream nor
> myself have.
>
> Secondly, if you had asked for a brief summary of the patch file
> (since you are too busy -- too busy to let anyone know for 30 days!),
> I'd have been to do so. After all, I spent 30 minutes going through
> some of your queries about the diff at 05:30 in the morning.
one thing I don't understand. Are all those changes really needed to get
gtk-gnutella work properly (not flood the network)?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Reply to: