Re: Is volatile dead?
* Marc Haber (mh+debian-volatile@zugschlus.de) [051123 13:57]:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:15:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > debian-volatile would surely do better, if
> > more persons would be involved in the team process. Why does it allways
> > need Andi or me to answer a mail on the mailing lists?
> I think that at least part of the issue is that there are no
> procedures known to me which to follow when reviewing packages. The
> only thing I see is that you two guys have the last word (as ftpmaster
> does have for the main archive) and that the default answer is "no".
Well, apart from that, there are some guidelines:
- accept only the changes necessary
- please see the rules on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-volatile/
I know that this is not enough - please feel free to ask us for more
details whenever you think something is not clear, but I have some
problems with coming up with rules out of my head right now. On the
other hand, we didn't had enough cases that we can really say "this and
that are the rules to follow".
> Maybe a tracking system would be in order as well.
Hm. It might be worth to try to get a pseudo-package for volatile ...
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: