Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?

To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Cc: debian-volatile@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:21:19 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050607122119.GB4214@ba.issia.cnr.it>
Mail-followup-to: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, debian-volatile@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20050605152238.GC26131@saruman.uio.no>
References: <20050605151753.GA25394@soften.ktu.lt> <20050605152238.GC26131@saruman.uio.no>

Someone suggested that discover1-data should enter the volatile archive.
It could have sense, IMHO. That along with an up-to-date d-installer
could allow installation of sarge for years from now...

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

Prev by Date: mirror from turkey
Next by Date: adding SpamAssassin to the volatile archive
Previous by thread: mirror from turkey
Next by thread: Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread