Re: utelnetd
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:45:14 -0500
> Hmm...`xterm` is unrelated: you'd run `telnet` or `ssh` *inside*
> `xterm`, no *instead of* `xterm`.
OK, I understand that. If X11 is running you use xterm or similar. If
X11 is not running you can do "ssh localhost" on the command line of a
virtual console.
> When you want to "log into localhost" you can usually use `su` instead
> of `ssh/telnet`. This said, I sometimes use `ssh` anyway (typically in
> scripts) ...
I considered only the live interactive case. Not a script.
> Presumably encryption is not needed for localhost ...
Exactly what I meant with "Naively, I wouldn't expect TLS to be
necessary for localhost. When a miscreant has access to a machine,
TLS on a local console connection probably won't help."
Thx, ... P.
--
VoIP: +1 604 670 0140
work: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:PeterEasthope
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: utelnetd
- From: Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com>
- Re: utelnetd
- From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>