Re: systemd may silently break your system!
Andy Smith wrote:
> This whole thing just seems like the normal process of developing
> and packaging a distribution. Poor interactions are found, reported,
> hopefully will be fixed. But once again there's people trying to use
> this as a daily driver and having weird expectations. And then some
> sort of triggering around anything involving systemd.
>
> I feel like we see it more and more, these expectations about sid,
> and I don't understand why.
There are people who have become invested in the idea that sid
is "stable enough" and have been told that it is comparable to a
rolling release model.
They have been misinformed but seem resistant to correction.
-dsr-
Reply to: