Re: systemd may silently break your system!
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 09:37:54AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> I see NO reason to point fingers of blame at systemd (cf. Subject:).
>
> I see nothing amiss here in the order in which packages were uploaded.
>
> I see NO reason that these two packages have to be upgraded in a specific
> order (cf. quoted text). Once the procps bug is fixed, upgrading EITHER
> of the two packages will cause the /etc/sysctl.conf to stop being used.
> It doesn't MATTER which one is upgraded first.
This whole thing just seems like the normal process of developing
and packaging a distribution. Poor interactions are found, reported,
hopefully will be fixed. But once again there's people trying to use
this as a daily driver and having weird expectations. And then some
sort of triggering around anything involving systemd.
I feel like we see it more and more, these expectations about sid,
and I don't understand why.
Thanks,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Reply to: