Re: Inclusive terminology (instead of master/slave) for network bonding/LACP

[Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 1:13 PM Gremlin <scott-andrews@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/23/24 12:51, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> [ >/dev/null ]
>
> >
> > Let's bring it back around to actual action.
> >
> > The possible positions:
> >
> > 1. The terminology is bad, and I'm willing to work on fixing it.
> >
> > 2. The terminology is bad, but I can't work on it myself.
> >
> > 3. The terminology does not bother me, but I don't care if someone else wants to fix it.
> >
> > 4. The terminology is good and we should not fix it.
> >
> > People taking positions one through three are people that I can
> > work with.
>
> 5. The terminology is good and we should fix it.

If you wish to see how this is going to play out, then visit
<https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1015>. That's the Ben Noordhuis
and Node.js pronoun scandal from 2014.

Jeff