On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:13:04AM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote: > jeremy ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> writes: [...] > > The other option of NAT for your IPv6 is frowned on > > I don't know why though. The other IPv6 access I have is through a VPN > and there, for privacy, of course my connection is NATted to the same > exit IPv6 address as everyone else's [...] Because NAT is falsely perceived as a security device. For privacy, IPv6 has much nicer options than "hiding" behind a NAT (on top of that, your biggest enemy these days is your browser anyway). And NAT seduces providers to perpetuate bad habits from v4 times (like giving you less than a /64). Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature