Re: lists
Hi everybody,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023, Pocket wrote:
> > What if there were more, that you did *not* see? Because they didn't
> > get through. If mail isn't reaching you, then the mail *telling* you
> > that mail isn't reaching you may also not reach you.
>
>
> Because some one from the list admin told me it was one.
>
> I was only sent that one bounce/kick email, so there is that......
we have sent you one _notification_ about the bounces. but if there
were more bounces there was no further notification because the
mailsystem wasn't able to deliver the mail to you. that is what you
were told.
so, the collegues here are correct: there were more bounces since
debian-user is a busy mailinglist and you get unsusbcribed because
your provider chose to reject mails sent to you.
best regards, Hanno Wagner
--
| Hanno Wagner | Member of the HTML Writers Guild | Rince@IRC |
| Eine gewerbliche Nutzung meiner Email-Adressen ist nicht gestattet! |
| 74 a3 53 cc 0b 19 - we did it! | Generation @ |
#Ein Unix-Fan ist in etwa so deplaziert wie ein Klopapier-Fan.
#Man benutzt es, oder man benutzt es nicht; das ist alles.
#
#Und natuerlich ruempft man seine Nase ueber die, die glauben
#darauf verzichten zu koennen...
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lists
- From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>
- References:
- lists
- From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>
- Re: lists
- From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
- Re: lists
- From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>
- Re: lists
- From: gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
- Re: lists
- From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>
- Re: lists
- From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
- Re: lists
- From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>