Re: Image handling in mutt

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Image handling in mutt
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 12:46:01 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 875y14vree.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <ZXYZ/t/Um5fIdsBj@axis.corp> <[🔎] 8FF729C3-4B61-42DC-B9B9-866BB5FBBE45@columbus.rr.com> <[🔎] 20231211121229.GB966562@zira.vinc17.org> <[🔎] 67a701d5-93ec-4897-9c4b-77a6021bc59e@columbus.rr.com>

On Monday, 11 Dec 2023 at 07:32, Pocket wrote:
> No it is microsoft non sense

I'm not an MS fanboi but please stop blaming MS for something they did
not invent!

-- 
Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2023-09-14) on Debian 12.2

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: why would "tr --complement --squeeze-repeats ..." append the substitution char once more? ...
Next by Date: Re: Image handling in mutt
Previous by thread: Re: On file systems
Next by thread: Re: Image handling in mutt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread