On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:08:19PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: [...] > Writing "did not work" just doesn't cut it on this list: > we need some specifics. Here's an example I ran this > morning on a reference given by David Christensen: This is more or less I thought at the first post: "not work" doesn't work here. For me, youtube-dl works most of the time. But this will almost certainly be a complex function of the downloader's location and the video in question, so... One thing I found out is that youtube-dl's cache seems to suffer poisoning from time to time (no wonder, with all that toxic javascript out there). A timely youtube-dl --rm-cache-dir got it unstuck for me once (meaning that a video which threw a 403 before downloaded nicely after). YMMV and things. Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature