OT: Charities (a rant) (was: Re: Who pays Debian developement)
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 08:00:14 AM gene heskett wrote:
> It does, but we should all remember that TANSTAAFL is a universal law.
> It cannot be broken.
Aside: Not the purpose of my response here, so plaese do not reply, but I
believe that I am supplying some free lunches. If not, I'll have to think
about and figure out in what way those lunches are not free. (I am not
charging anyone any kind of fee, nor asking for anything like recognition (I
guess I might sometime get some recognition), but I don't feel like that is a
motivation for my efforts. (And I'm intentionally not describing those efforts,
they are not related to my comments on this (or any other) mailing list.)
> We are also very aware that info on the suppliers of such funds is a
> valuable commodity to the hacker. There are quite a number of American
> based charities I do not contribute to simply because they insist on
> ones social security number. That ain't gonna happen. Make it the equ of
> me handing you a $50 bill, untraceable cash, no strings attached. It's
> my thank you.
The reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not contribute to
has to do with two (related) things:
* How much of my contribution actually makes it through to the targeted
(trying to think of the right word) -- maybe just the target -- actually to a
disabled veteran, or starving child, or ...
* How much money the top executives of the organization make. I won't get
into detail here, but if they are taking home $350,000 a year and expecting
donations from people making $30,000 a year (by advertising on TV looking for
contributions of, for example, $19 a month, I have a problem with that.
Further (is this #3? -- I can't count ;-) in some cases those charities
advertising on TV use names similar to the names of some actual charitable
organiztion, but they are not actually that organization and they pass through
only a very small portion of their income to that charitable organization.
Just to make up an example (and picking on maybe a recognizable name just so
the example is, I hope, easeir to understand:
There is a St. Jude's (children's?) hospital.
Imgaine that there is also an organization named "Friends of St. Jude's"
(completely made up as far as I know). Imagine that they advertise on TV
seeking $19 per month contributions, and then pass on a fraction of that to
St. Judes?
Your contribution is diluted twice -- by the overhead of St. Jude's Hospital
itself and the overhead of "Friends of St. Judes" (and it is quite possible
(I've found several examples) that the top (5?) executives are taking home
upwards of $350,000 / year each.
--
rhk
(sig revised 20221206)
If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML;
avoid top posting; and keep it "on list". (Oxford comma (and semi-colon)
included at no charge.) If you revise the topic, change the Subject: line.
If you change the topic, start a new thread.
Writing is often meant for others to read and understand (legal documents
excepted?) -- make it easier for your reader by various means, including
liberal use of whitespace (short paragraphs, separated by whitespace / blank
lines) and minimal use of (obscure?) jargon, abbreviations, acronyms, and
references.
If someone has already responded to a question, decide whether any response
you add will be helpful or not ...
A picture is worth a thousand words. A video (or "audio"): not so much --
divide by 10 for each minute of video (or audio) or create a transcript and
edit it to 10% of the original.
A speaker who uses ahhs, ums, or such may have a real physical or mental
disability, or may be showing disrespect for his listeners by not properly
preparing in advance and thinking before speaking. (Remember Cicero who did
not have enough time to write a short missive.) (That speaker might have been
"trained" to do this by being interrupted often if he pauses.)
A radio (or TV) station which broadcasts speakers with high pitched voices (or
very low pitched / gravelly voices) (which older people might not be able to
hear properly) disrespects its listeners. Likewise if it broadcasts
extraneous or disturbing sounds (like gunfire or crying), or broadcasts
speakers using their native language (with or without an overdubbed
translation).
A person who writes a sig this long probably has issues and disrespects (and
offends) a large number of readers. ;-)
'
Reply to: