Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk

To: Debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
From: thyme after thyme <thyme-harp@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:19:16 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 5929ebe347faa940be82a210d08dd38c@riseup.net>
Reply-to: thyme-harp@riseup.net
In-reply-to: <[🔎] f98b8018cec5493d9d1c85064dde7e1b@riseup.net>
References: <[🔎] f98b8018cec5493d9d1c85064dde7e1b@riseup.net>

Charles and tomas, you were both right in your guesses. Thanks a billion
for the help!

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
  - From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>

References:
- partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
  - From: thyme after thyme <thyme-harp@riseup.net>

Prev by Date: Re: reportbug: don't know: bug in apt [list] or in grep
Next by Date: Re: Cloning a disk: partclone?
Previous by thread: Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
Next by thread: Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread