Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 08:29:15 +0100
Message-id: <Y8uUSwFed5B/CUTB@tuxteam.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5929ebe347faa940be82a210d08dd38c@riseup.net>
References: <[🔎] f98b8018cec5493d9d1c85064dde7e1b@riseup.net> <[🔎] 5929ebe347faa940be82a210d08dd38c@riseup.net>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:19:16AM +0000, thyme after thyme wrote:
> 
> Charles and tomas, you were both right in your guesses. Thanks a billion
> for the help!

Glad you found it :)

Cheers
-- 
t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
  - From: thyme after thyme <thyme-harp@riseup.net>
- Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
  - From: thyme after thyme <thyme-harp@riseup.net>

Prev by Date: user accounts in docker group
Next by Date: Re: user accounts in docker group
Previous by thread: Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk
Next by thread: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread