Re: ping

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ping
From: Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:56:02 +0000 (GMT)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.21.2211141054570.6470@einstein.home.woodall.me.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Y3G+MI9FWT4+Enhv@wooledge.org>
References: <[🔎] E1ouDju-0000Yx-9t@joule.invalid> <[🔎] Y3FXOQfTjjKBrCG3@singvogel.net> <[🔎] CAH8yC8=mCN0YaBXhxQsNBprA5fwy0hMZ=h81de8AM+w-FKkN=g@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] Y3G+MI9FWT4+Enhv@wooledge.org>

On Sun, 13 Nov 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote:

unicorn:~$ command -v ls
ls

But sure, the OP could provide the output of "command -v ping" in addition
to "type ping".  It couldn't hurt.


command -V ping

Reply to:

References:
- ping
  - From: peter@easthope.ca
- Re: ping
  - From: Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net>
- Re: ping
  - From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
- Re: ping
  - From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Causing segmentations fault; Was: Re: No Public Key
Next by Date: Re: how to add more ipv6 addresses to an interface that is being configured through dhcpv6
Previous by thread: Re: ping
Next by thread: RFC: What would be the "correct debian way" to clean up unwanted languages from an installation?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread