Re: Alternatives to ISC dhcp-client ?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Alternatives to ISC dhcp-client ?
- From: Kamil Jońca <kjonca@o2.pl>
- Date: Sun, 08 May 2022 10:46:18 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87fslkfm3p.fsf@alfa.kjonca>
- In-reply-to: <EkKiZ-e3dn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (Jeremy Ardley's message of "Sun, 08 May 2022 10:20:01 +0200")
- References: <EkJPX-e2On-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EkJPX-e2On-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EkJPX-e2On-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EkKiZ-e3dn-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> writes:
> On 8/5/22 3:19 pm, Kamil Jońca wrote:
>> I cannot see if systemd-networkd can run scripts[1] after change in
>> lease. Am I missing something?
>>
> The top answer below is a partial answer to your question.
>
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/469716/systemd-networkd-run-script-after-dhcp-client-aqcuires-new-address
You mean:
"I couldn't get networkd-dispatcher to respond to dhcp changes on Ubuntu
Server 20.04, but[...] " :) ?
Yes. I know that this is two year old, but I did not found anything
newer with answer.
>
> But systemd-networkd also has a huge number of configuration options
> that may do what you want anyway
>
> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.network.html
Hm. Can you create bridge without ports with systemd-networkd?
i.e.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
iface qemu inet static
dns-search myquemudomain
address 192.168.1.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
bridge_ports none #part which I was not able to achieve
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I still have situation described in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2022/02/msg00118.html
I simply try to look for migration, but it seems that most of testing I
will have to do by myself.
KJ
--
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
Reply to: