[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problems with the nouveau driver



Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2022, 18:04:35 CEST schrieb Leandro neto:
Hi,
I do not like the nouveau driver, because it is badly maintained, as other 
people also confirmed.

Did you try the nvdia-driver? For your card it is the 390xx, so look at 
packages with this name.

You need the kernel-package and the libgl1-nvidia*-packages, but I think, you 
know this.

In the past, I had trouble, to build for an actual kernel. If the build fails, 
you can also try another kernel version, or, what sometimes also helps, 
deinstall all nvidia-related packages and download the installer for your card 
directly from the nvidia site.

Hope, this helps.

Good luck!

Hans


> i kjnow the problem since 2019 it is a vulnerqability. publish it ojm
> virustotal. but nobody cares it will destriy your hardware 
> leandro +552122366155
> Enviado via UOL Mail
> 
> 
> Assunto: Problems with the nouveau driver
> De: jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com
> Enviado em: 5 de abril de 2022 17:16
> Para: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
> Hi,
> I've just had to replace the motherboard, cpu and ram in my PC, and after a
> few  hoops got to the point where I can boot Debian Testing in  kde.
> However I keep getting screen windowing problems before eventually X shuts
> down. Mouse still works for a while, the graphics card is  an nvidia GT
> 730, How do I go about trying to sort this out. Here's some errors from
> dmesg
> 
> 
> 
> [  188.614806] nouveau 0000:2d:00.0: firmware: failed to load
> nouveau/nv106_fuc084 (-2) [  188.614812] nouveau 0000:2d:00.0: Direct
> firmware load for nouveau/nv106_fuc084 failed with error -2 [  188.614819]
> nouveau 0000:2d:00.0: firmware: failed to load nouveau/nv106_fuc084d (-2) [
>  188.614820] nouveau 0000:2d:00.0: Direct firmware load for
> nouveau/nv106_fuc084d failed with error -2 [  188.614821] nouveau
> 0000:2d:00.0: msvld: unable to load firmware data [  188.614823] nouveau
> 0000:2d:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19
> 
> 
> Thanks
> James





Reply to: