[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd.resolved problems




On 25/3/22 7:26 am, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 06:51:55AM +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
Is there any compelling reason to use systemd.resolved over ordinary DNS ?
If not, why was it inflicted on debian?
It's disabled by default.  It's there if you wish to try it, but out of
the box, it does absolutely nothing except sit there taking up space.


Are you sure it's disabled by default? I don't recall converting over to it on my various machines. And when I search on it there are lots of pages about how to disable it, and virtually none on how to enable it.

I thought there might be some voodoo reason to do with something called dbus - of which I know nothing, nor the obscure journald.

Anyway, bind9 works pretty well as a local caching nameserver

--
Jeremy


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: